cryptocurrency to look out for Top

The conference on traditional Chinese medicine is still going on. We can only hope that the big news after the market will be overweight and help it tomorrow. Otherwise, there is no suspense about the consequences. Let's go back and have a look at the previous time when stamp duty was halved. It is estimated that it is the same.The volume of transactions has come up, and this volume can be a little familiar. I remember that the first two days of the last wave were like this. The volume can rise suddenly, but the performance of individual stocks is average, and the next day is still average, but after two but three, the third day begins to pull straight lines. However, we should pay attention to the problem that the main funds of the market are still flowing out, and it is an uninterrupted outflow. Who can explain this problem? Anyway, I can't explain it. Theoretically, it is right to enter it on a large scale, but why is it still negative? I don't believe that retail investors are fleeing, but if institutions are fleeing, what is the mystery? Is it that institutions are still not optimistic about the general trend? Under such a big policy, institutions still think that the stock market is unreliable! I don't believe this either. ......On December 11, 2024, the market was unclear.

No one wants to see this K-line, hang the monument! It's either ascension, or in the old mode, you know, it won't fall back for a day. That's the problem. It seems a little different this time. After all, the big news was released after the close of trading yesterday, and then Hong Kong stocks and A50 reacted quickly and violently. Under this background, why should we go the same way?The conference on traditional Chinese medicine is still going on. We can only hope that the big news after the market will be overweight and help it tomorrow. Otherwise, there is no suspense about the consequences. Let's go back and have a look at the previous time when stamp duty was halved. It is estimated that it is the same.On this day, it is lucky that the late account can remain red, and I accidentally lost money! No, there are a lot of people who closed at a loss today. If the warehouse is changed in the morning, it is nine times out of ten.

The volume of transactions has come up, and this volume can be a little familiar. I remember that the first two days of the last wave were like this. The volume can rise suddenly, but the performance of individual stocks is average, and the next day is still average, but after two but three, the third day begins to pull straight lines. However, we should pay attention to the problem that the main funds of the market are still flowing out, and it is an uninterrupted outflow. Who can explain this problem? Anyway, I can't explain it. Theoretically, it is right to enter it on a large scale, but why is it still negative? I don't believe that retail investors are fleeing, but if institutions are fleeing, what is the mystery? Is it that institutions are still not optimistic about the general trend? Under such a big policy, institutions still think that the stock market is unreliable! I don't believe this either. ......No one wants to see this K-line, hang the monument! It's either ascension, or in the old mode, you know, it won't fall back for a day. That's the problem. It seems a little different this time. After all, the big news was released after the close of trading yesterday, and then Hong Kong stocks and A50 reacted quickly and violently. Under this background, why should we go the same way?The volume of transactions has come up, and this volume can be a little familiar. I remember that the first two days of the last wave were like this. The volume can rise suddenly, but the performance of individual stocks is average, and the next day is still average, but after two but three, the third day begins to pull straight lines. However, we should pay attention to the problem that the main funds of the market are still flowing out, and it is an uninterrupted outflow. Who can explain this problem? Anyway, I can't explain it. Theoretically, it is right to enter it on a large scale, but why is it still negative? I don't believe that retail investors are fleeing, but if institutions are fleeing, what is the mystery? Is it that institutions are still not optimistic about the general trend? Under such a big policy, institutions still think that the stock market is unreliable! I don't believe this either. ......